The paradox of the social investment state. Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era
Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, Antwerp ; Cantillon, Béa
CSB - Antwerp
2011
29 p.
employment ; poverty ; social policy ; social security ; Lisbon strategy
CSB Working Paper
11/03
European Union
http://www.centrumvoorsociaalbeleid.be/
English
Bibliogr.
"After the European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion, on the eve of the elaboration of policies designed to help reach the Europe 2020 target of lifting 20 million people out of poverty, it is important to take stock of the outcomes of the Lisbon agenda for growth, employment and social inclusion. The question arises why, despite growth of average incomes and of employment, poverty rates have not gone down, but have either stagnated or even increased. In this paper we identify the following trends: rising employment has benefited workless households only partially; income protection for the working-age population out of work has become less adequate; social policies and, more generally, social redistribution have become less pro-poor. These observations are indicative of the ambivalence of the Lisbon Strategy and its underlying investment paradigm."
Digital
The ETUI is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the ETUI.