Il ritorno della discrezionalità giudiziale dopo la sentenza n. 194/2018 della Corte costituzionale
2019
33
2
Spring
285-303
dismissal ; unjustified dismissal ; constitutional court ; labour law ; equal rights ; case law
Law
http://dx.doi.org/10.1441/93356
Italian
Bibliogr.
"The paper deals with the doctrinal debate on the role assigned to the judge in the construction of legal rules, criticizing the hypothesis that the balance between law and judgment depends exclusively on a clash between legislative power and the judiciary. In the field of labor law, the author focuses attention on the events that have involved the disciplines of dismissals over the last ten years, noting the alternation between attempts by the legislator to make the consequences of unjustified dismissal certain and calculable, and attempts on the part of the judges to reclaim spaces of discretion. The recent sentence n. 194/2018 contributes to the return of discretion in the discipline of dismissals, on the assumption that only the judicial discretion can guarantee the observance of the constitutional principle of equality in the determination of the indemnity due in case of unjustified dismissal."
Paper
The ETUI is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the ETUI.