Epidemiology and litigation: the Sellafield childhood leukaemia cases
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A
1998
161
3
313-325
children ; expert report ; ionising radiation ; judicial procedure ; leukaemia ; nuclear reactor
Law
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2983205
English
Bibliogr.
"Statisticians and scientists are often required to provide information outside the scientific community. One important example is as an expert witness in the law courts. The civil litigation cases of Reay versus British Nuclear Fuels plc and Hope versus British Nuclear Fuels plc are a vivid illustration of how science and scientists interact with the law and lawyers. The personal injury cases were decided on the basis of how a specific epidemiological association should be properly interpreted, and this involved many experts. It is desirable that statisticians and scientists understand the nature of expert evidence, and these two cases are used to illuminate the role of the scientist in civil litigation."
Digital
The ETUI is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the ETUI.