By browsing this website, you acknowledge the use of a simple identification cookie. It is not used for anything other than keeping track of your session from page to page. OK
1

The changing nature of collective employment relations

Bookmarks
Article

Marginson, Paul

Employee Relations. The International Journal

2015

37

6

13 p.

collective bargaining ; collective agreement ; labour relations ; trade union ; trade union membership

Labour relations

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/ER-03-2015-0049

English

Bibliogr.

"Purpose

The paper surveys developments in four aspects of collective employment relations since the mid-1960s: collective representation and organisation; collective bargaining coverage and structure; the collective bargaining agenda; and joint consultation arrangements. It considers the reasons underlying change.



Design/methodology/approach

A range of published sources are drawn on, including quantitative, survey-based and qualitative, case-study and other evidence.



Findings

The landscape of collective employment relations has changed markedly over the past half century. Membership of trade unions has fallen from around half of the workforce to one quarter. Employers who mainly conducted collective bargaining through employers' associations now negotiate, if at all, on a firm-by-firm basis. Collective bargaining coverage has sharply declined and now only extends to a minority of the private sector workforce. The bargaining agenda has been hollowed out. Joint consultation arrangements too are less widespread than they were around 1980.



Originality/value

The paper contends that change has been driven by three underlying processes. ‘Marketization' of collective employment relations entailing a shift from an industrial or occupational to an enterprise frame of reference. The rise of ‘micro-corporatism', reflecting increased emphasis on the common interests of collective actors within an enterprise frame. Finally, the voluntarism, underpinning Britain's collective employment relations became more ‘asymmetric', with employers' preferences increasingly predominant."

Digital



Bookmarks