"Purpose
The purpose of the piece is to reflect on some of the problems and issues emerging from the changing role of the state in the UK's industrial relations since 1964 – the year the Labour Party was elected to power under Harold Wilson's leadership. The paper argues that we have seen an uneven set of developments in terms of the role of the state in the UK's industrial relations system. Increasingly progressive interventions on a range of subjects such as equality, health and safety and others have coincided with a greater commercialisation of the state and greater fragmentation.

Design/methodology/approach
This is based on a reflective review of various texts and a personal interest in the role of the political in the arena of employee relations. It references a range of texts on the subject of the state in the context of the UK's employee relations system.

Findings
In political terms there has been an uneven and incoherent set of positions which have meant that there is a growing set of tensions and breakdown in the political consensus over worker rights. In addition, the agencies of the state and other state bodies entrusted with the development of a more socially driven view of industrial relations have been increasingly and steadily undermined and weakened by governments especially those on the right. The political context of industrial relations have become fractured and unable to sustain a coherent longer term view.

Originality/value
The paper tries to bring out the role of the political context and the way in has shaped the changing terrain of industrial relations and argues that the question of fragmentation is not solely visible in employee relations but in the broader political context."

Support: Digital