Dose-response relationship between hand-arm vibration exposure and vibrotactile thresholds among roadworker
Clemm, Thomas ; Faerden, Karl ; Ulvestad, Bente ; Lunde, Lars-Kristian ; Nordby, Karl-Christian
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2020
77
3
188-193
exposure assessment ; hand arm vibration ; dose response relationship ; neuromuscular disorders ; vascular function tests ; road work
Risk assessment and risk management
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105926
English
Bibliogr.;Ill.
"Background
Testing of vibration perception threshold (VPT) at the fingertips as a quantitative measure of tactile sensitivity is a commonly used tool in diagnosing hand–arm vibration syndrome. There is limited research on dose–response relationships between hand–arm vibration (HAV) exposure and VPT on an individual level.
Aims
Assess possible dose–response relationships on an individual level between HAV exposure and VPT at the fingertips.
Methods
We assessed average daily vibration exposure (m/s2A8) and cumulative lifetime HAV exposure for 104 participants from different departments in a road maintenance company based on vibration measurements and questionnaires. VPT was measured based on the technical method described in ISO 13091-1:2005 using octave frequencies 8–500 Hz. We investigated associations using linear regression models with significance level p≤0.05.
Results
The participants were either exposed to rock drills (n=33), impact wrenches (n=52) or none of these tools (n=19). Exposure to rock drills and impact wrenches was associated with elevated VPT for all seven test frequencies in the second and fifth fingers of both hands. A dose–response with the daily exposure measure m/s2(A8) was found based on 1.2 m/s2(A8) for impact wrenches, and 5.4 m/s2(A8) for rock drills. A stronger association was found with the cumulative exposure for rock drills compared with impact wrenches, and for the second finger compared with the fifth finger.
Conclusions
HAV exposure was associated with elevated VPT, also at exposure levels below the common exposure action value of 2.5 m/s2(A8). Lowering the HAV exposure can contribute to prevent increasing VPTs in these workers."
Digital
The ETUI is co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the ETUI.