By browsing this website, you acknowledge the use of a simple identification cookie. It is not used for anything other than keeping track of your session from page to page. OK
0

Comparing and explaining HR department effectiveness assessments: evidence from line managers and trade union representatives

Bookmarks
Article
H

De Winne, Sophie ; Delmotte, Jeroen ; Gilbert, Caroline ; Sels, Luc

International Journal of Human Resource Management

2013

24

7-8

April

1708-1735

human resources management ; management attitude ; trade union attitude ; trade union officer

Belgium

Personnel management

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.725069

English

Bibliogr.

"We compare and explain effectiveness assessments of two HR stakeholders: line managers and trade union representatives. We examine whether they have the same preferences regarding the roles the HR department has to fulfil (Ulrich 1997). Next, we test which strong HRM system characteristics (Bowen and Ostroff 2004) are decisive in determining the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in the preferential roles. With these analyses we examine whether the HR roles and strong HRM system characteristics are equally important to different stakeholders. Results show that the perceived effectiveness of the HR department in its operational roles is decisive in trade union representatives' general HR effectiveness assessment. For line managers, process-oriented roles are crucial. Next, if the HR department scores high on strong HRM system characteristics, it is perceived as more effective in its HR roles. Yet, the importance of specific HRM system characteristics depends on the role and stakeholder."

Paper



Bookmarks