Documents team work 104 results

"Employers can use profit sharing to elicit effort in teams as long as shirking is sufficiently costly. Analysis of descriptions of job vacancies from the online job board monster.com reveals that the threat of shirking does not deter employers from offering profit sharing to reward workers in teams. However, when team work is prevalent, employers are more likely to advertise a work environment where shirking is easier to detect and penalize. We do not find evidence of similar employers' efforts to deter shirking in teams if jobs entail: frequent interactions with a supervisor, volunteering, or work for a non-profit organization."

"In recent years many companies have introduced self-regulatory teamwork requiring changes in leadership behaviour and systems as well. Consequently a renewed interest has arisen in management by objectives (MBO) as a means for leading self-regulating teams. But how do MBO systems work and how effective are they? The MBO system of a company in the construction supply industry was analysed. This company had implemented MBO at team level five years ago. In order to explore the mechanisms and effects of MBO at team level a model for group goal setting was tested. One hundred and seventy-six employees in twenty-six teams participated in the study, but only twenty-one groups having objective productivity data were included in the analyses at team level. Group goal commitment and group goals moderated by task interdependence are supposed to influence group processes as a mediating variable for group effectiveness. Results do not consistently support this model. Group goals and goal commitment predict group productivity and job satisfaction but group processes mediate only the relationship to job satisfaction. The moderating effect of task interdependence could not be supported. The consequences for developing a model for MBO at team level and implementing effective MBO systems are discussed."

"The number of firms supporting work from home has risen dramatically as advances in communication technology have fundamentally transformed the way humans cooperate. A growing literature addresses working from home, but focuses only on individual workers, overlooking potential influence of co‐worker engagement. Our aim is to study the influence of co‐workers working from home on individual and team performance. We use unique data from a large‐scale survey involving nine European countries, 259 establishments, 869 teams and 11,011 employees to show that the impact of working from home by co‐workers on performance is considerable and has remained hidden in past studies because they did not account for co‐worker effects. While working from home may be useful for some workers, it does bring issues for them as well. Specifically, we demonstrate that co‐workers working from home negatively impact employee performance. Moreover, team performance is worse when more co‐workers are working from home."

"L'impact du passage d'une évaluation collective à une évaluation individuelle de la performance, ou inversement, sur les équipes de travail et leur rendement est étudié en contexte réel au sein de deux équipes ayant récemment vécu le passage d'une évaluation collective à une évaluation individuelle pour l'une, et inversement pour l'autre. Si dans nos deux échantillons, l'évaluation individualisée s'accompagne d'une individualisation du rapport au travail, les effets sont plus contrastés en ce qui concerne le vécu individuel, la qualité des relations interpersonnelles et la performance. Lorsque, du fait des critères d'évaluation retenus, les contributions individuelles à la performance collective sont indétectables en l'absence d'évaluation individualisée, l'évaluation collective est associée à la suspicion et à une moindre performance en comparaison de l'évaluation individuelle. À l'inverse, lorsque selon les critères retenus pour évaluer la performance les membres de l'équipe peuvent aisément s'entraider pour améliorer la performance collective, l'évaluation collective est mieux perçue et est associée à de meilleures relations interpersonnelles et une meilleure performance que l'évaluation individuelle. Alors que l'évaluation individuelle est généralement privilégiée dans les entreprises, cette étude apporte des résultats empiriques à l'appui des recherches qui postulent que l'évaluation collective des équipes de travail est susceptible de renforcer la performance globale, en comparaison de l'évaluation individuelle de leurs membres, car elle favorise l'entraide et la régulation collective. Toutefois, ces résultats mettent en évidence que l'effet positif de l'évaluation collective en comparaison de l'évaluation individuelle n'est observé que lorsque les critères d'évaluation favorisent la régulation collective de la performance. Cette étude permet d'identifier ces deux éléments : 1- dans quel cas telle modalité d'évaluation semble préférable à telle autre; et 2- quels critères d'évaluation adopter pour favoriser les effets positifs de l'évaluation collective sur la performance engendrés par l'entraide et la régulation collective en cours d'activité."

"This article is focused on the importance of accepting the modern concepts of operations based on knowledge management, and of organisations that learn and which are based on human capital, as the most important resource of today. This leads us to the conclusion that the main and predominant resources of the modern economy, right across the globe, are applied knowledge, education and science. Therefore, the construction of a society based on knowledge becomes a basic imperative of a global economy in which intellectual capital plays a lead role. Following a review of the argumentation behind the learning organisation, the author draws case study evidence on the issues raised from Telekom Srbje, which is on the start of the road to becoming a learning organisation, while arguing that professional, motivated and competent employees are not only an organisation's most valuable assets in the knowledge economy, they are a key source of a competitive advantage which competitors elsewhere will find impossible to replicate."

"This article presents an ethnographic exploration of resistance to teamworking in a UK research and development laboratory named RDL. It focuses on the nature of autonomy and responsibility and the implications for resistance. It finds that resistance is shaped by the laboratory technicians' individualistic interactions with technology, the laboratory layout and the technicians' desire for personal task-related autonomy and individual responsibility rather than team-based accountability. However, although resistance is linked to an individualistic interpretation of work it is supported by collective collusion. The article also finds that resistance is not necessarily anti-work. It is simultaneously oriented towards the interests of the company and individual technicians through the technicians' desire to perform their job well. Finally, the article demonstrates the local and constructed nature of resistance."