Documents asbestos 827 results

"Objective
The aim of this study was to confirm the relationship between several parameters of exposure to asbestos and pleural plaques (PP) using data from a large cohort of retired workers occupationally exposed to asbestos in France.
Method
A large screening programme, including high-resolution CT (HRCT) examinations at inclusion and two other HRCT campaigns, was organised from 2003 to 2016 in four regions of France for voluntary, formerly asbestos-exposed workers. Exposure to asbestos has been evaluated by industrial hygienists based on the complete work history. The time since first exposure, the time since last exposure, Cumulative Exposure Index and maximum level of exposure to asbestos, were used in logistic regression using fractional polynomials to model the relationship with PP.
Results
The study included 5392 subjects with at least one HRCT available. There was a significant non-linear effect of time since first exposure, time since last exposure and Cumulative Exposure Index to asbestos on the presence of PP. The risk of PP increased with increasing Cumulative Exposure Index to asbestos adjusted for time since first exposure, age and smoking status. Models also show that PP odds rise with increasing time since first exposure adjusted for cumulative index exposure, age and smoking status. PP odds decrease when time since last exposure increases.
Conclusion
The study provides new data on the link between asbestos exposure and the presence of PP using fractional polynomials with non-linear relationships for time exposure parameters and asbestos exposure parameters."

"Objectives
We aimed to estimate the fraction of deaths from ovarian cancer attributable to asbestos exposure in Lombardy Region, Italy, using a novel approach that exploits the fact that ovarian cancer asbestos exposure is associated with pleural cancer and other risk factors for breast cancer.
Methods
This ecological study is based on the Italian National Institute of Statistics mortality data. We formulate a trivariate Bayesian joint disease model to estimate the attributable fraction (AF) and the number of ovarian cancer deaths attributable to asbestos exposure from the geographic distribution of ovarian, pleural and breast cancer mortality at the municipality level from 2000 to 2018. Expected deaths and standardised mortality ratios were calculated using regional rates.
Results
We found shared dependencies between ovarian and pleural cancer, which capture risk factors common to the two diseases (asbestos exposure), and a spatially structured clustering component shared between ovarian and breast cancer, capturing other risk factors. Based on 10 462 ovarian cancer deaths, we estimated that 574 (95% credibility interval 388–819) were attributable to asbestos (AF 5.5%; 95% credibility interval 3.7–7.8). AF reaches 34%–47% in some municipalities with known heavy asbestos pollution.
Conclusions
The impact of asbestos on ovarian cancer occurrence can be relevant, particularly in areas with high asbestos exposure. Estimating attributable cases was possible only by using advanced Bayesian modelling to consider other risk factors for ovarian cancer. These findings are instrumental in tailoring public health surveillance programmes and implementing compensation and prevention policies."

"Malgré l'interdiction d'usage de l'amiante depuis 1997, le risque lié à l'exposition en milieu professionnel reste une problématique d'actualité. Cet article a pour objectif de décrire la filière du traitement des eaux usées, d'identifier les postes de travail susceptibles d'exposer à des fibres d'amiante mises en suspension dans l'air ou émises dans les aérosols, et de proposer des actions visant à prévenir ce risque chez les travailleurs de la filière."

"Esophageal cancer (EC), which includes squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC), is an important cancer with poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Several occupational exposures have been associated with EC. We aim to investigate the association between occupational asbestos exposure and EC risk, considering types of asbestos and histology of the disease. We included studies mentioned in the list of references in previous reviews and pooled analyses, and we conducted an independent search in PubMed and Scopus. Forest plots of relative risks (RR) were constructed based on the association between occupational asbestos and EC risk. Random-effects models were used to address heterogeneity between 48 independent cohort and case-control studies. We found an association between occupational asbestos exposure and EC (meta-relative risk [RR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.32; I2 = 58.8%, p-heterogeneity [het] <.001). The results of stratification by job (p-het = .20) indicate an increased RR among asbestos product workers (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.81), asbestos applicators (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.20-1.67), and construction workers (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24). There was no heterogeneity in meta-RR according to outcome (p = .29), geographic region (p = .69), year of publication (p = .59), quality score (p = .73), asbestos type (p = .93), study design (p = .87), and gender (p = .88), control for potential confounders (p = .20), year of first employment (p = .94) and exposure level (p = .43). The stratification analysis by histology type found an increased RR for both ESCC 1.33(1.03-1.71) and EAC 1.45(1.03-2.04) (p-het = .68). We didn't find evidence of publication bias (p = .07). The results of our study suggest that occupational asbestos exposure is associated with an increased risk of EC in both histology types."

"Background
Asbestos causes cancer and non-cancerous lung and pleural diseases and can also have a negative psychological impact but little is known about its effect on health-related quality of life.
Objectives
The aim of this study is to describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of retired men with a history of occupational exposure to asbestos and examine factors linked with low HRQoL.
Methods
Retired male workers of the French Asbestos-Related Disease Cohort (ARDCO) completed self-questionnaires that included SF-36v2 and HAD scales, questions about their perception of asbestos (perceived dangers and level of exposure, expectations to fall ill, or knowing someone who is) and their respiratory symptoms. Asbestos exposure was assessed by industrial hygienists. A perceived risk score was created using factorial analysis. Multivariable regressions were performed for all SF-36 subscales.
Results
A total of 1266 of 2075 questionnaires (61%) were returned complete and included in analysis. After adjustment for potential confounders, an increase in perceived risk score resulted in a decrease in physical component summary score (PCS), up to 10.7 points (p = 0.048) and in mental component summary score (MCS) (p = 0.044). Presence of respiratory symptoms was also associated with significantly decreased PCS and MCS (p < 0.001). Poor HRQoL was linked to higher perceived risk score with p ≤ 0.01 for all SF-36 dimensions. Asbestos exposure assessed by an expert was not associated with any outcome.
Conclusions
All dimensions of HRQoL appear to be affected by the perceived risk of incurring asbestos-related disease and respiratory symptoms."

"As asbestos fibers and other fine particles have been studied extensively to correlate physical and chemical properties with their potential for negative human health impact on inhalation, there remains no concise definitions for the individual particle types nor collective considerations of combined variabilities. Extensive studies relating negative health to asbestos morphology, chemistry, surface effects, and biodurability form general qualitative bins of what is more likely causative or less, but do not provide enough information to quantitatively dismiss particles with parameters outside any given range. Further, natural mineral species and accessory mineralization makes standardization of universally applicable reference materials nearly unobtainable. With modern advent of engineered nanoparticles, we are adding even more unknowns to the universe of the microscopic size fraction and its potential for human disease, and our paradigm is challenged."

"Objective
To conduct meta-analyses of occupational asbestos exposure and oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer risk, including a critical exposure assessment approach.
Methods
The search strategy was executed on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases (March 2022, March 2024). Effect estimates (ORs, HRs, standardised incidence ratio and standardised mortality ratio) from eligible cohort and case-control studies were combined in random effects models. Meta-relative risks (mRRs) were calculated by cancer site and exposure characteristics. Investigators with occupational epidemiology and hygiene expertise came to a consensus on the estimates where there was confidence in significant asbestos exposure.
Results
A total of 82 (oesophageal), 153 (stomach) and 144 (colorectal) papers met the inclusion criteria. Elevated mRRs were observed for any occupational asbestos exposure for oesophageal (1.17 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.29)), stomach (1.14 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.23)) and colorectal cancer (1.16 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.24)). There was consistency of mRR estimates and higher mRRs in meta-analyses where there was increased confidence in the categorisation of highly exposed workers, including among the highest exposed workers in exposure-response studies (oesophageal: 1.63 (95% CI 1.29 to 2.06); stomach: 1.28 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.52); colorectal: 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.53)), among asbestos insulation workers (oesophageal: 1.68 (95% 1.19 to 2.36); stomach: 1.53 (95% 0.93 to 2.51); colorectal: 1.59 (95% 1.14 to 2.23)) and among workers in cohorts with a twofold or greater risk of asbestos-related lung cancer (oesophageal: 1.40 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.71); stomach: 1.33 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.56); colorectal: 1.47 (95% CI 1.34 to 1.61)).
Conclusion
The meta-analyses support a causal link between occupational asbestos exposure and the risk of oesophageal, stomach and colorectal cancer."

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,

"Background
The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence and mortality from various digestive cancer sites and their potential link with pleural plaques, in a French cohort of workers previously occupationally exposed to asbestos.
Methods
We conducted a 10-year follow-up study in 13,481 male subjects, included in the cohort between October 2003 and December 2005, for whom asbestos exposure was assessed by calculation of a cumulative exposure index (CEI) in equivalent fibres.years/mL for each subject. We conducted an incidence study and a mortality study. Complementary analysis was restricted to men who had performed at least one chest CT-scan (N = 4,794). We used a Cox model with age as the time axis variable, adjusted for smoking, time since first exposure (TSFE), CEI to asbestos and the existence of pleural plaques on CT-scan.
Results
In the incidence study, a significant dose–response relationship was observed between CEI to asbestos and oesophageal cancer (HR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01–1.06]) in the entire cohort after adjustment for TSFE and smoking status. In subjects undergoing CT-scan, a significant association between pleural plaques was observed for oesophageal cancer incidence (HR 2.80, 95% CI [1.09–7.20]) and in the mortality study, multivariate analyses showed a significant dose–effect response between CEI to asbestos and death from oesophageal cancer (HR 1.03, 95% CI [1.00–1.05]) in the entire cohort.
Conclusions
This large-scale study confirms results concerning a likely relationship between asbestos exposure and oesophageal cancer, and the association between this cancer and pleural plaques after adjustment on CEI to asbestos."

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License,