By continuing your navigation on this site, you accept the use of a simple identification cookie. No other use is made with this cookie.OK
Main catalogue
Main catalogue
0

Legitimacy versus incentives: Explaining the difference between early and late union responses to nonstandard employment in the Netherlands

Bookmarks Report an error
Article

van Veldhoven, Jeroen

Journal of Industrial Relations

2024

Early view

precarious employment ; trade union ; temporary work agency ; labour market

Netherlands

Employment

https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856241228660

English

Bibliogr.

"With the spread of alternative work arrangements across European labor markets, union responses to nonstandard employment have increasingly received scholarly attention. Based on a process-tracing analysis of the Netherlands between 1971 and 1996, I propose an alternative framework for understanding the divergence between early and late union responses to nonstandard employment. Rather than a choice between cooperation with management or outsiders, this case study shows that trade unions initially faced a dilemma between a legitimacy-based and an incentive-based strategy when nonstandard employment took off. Whereas the first strategy is inherently exclusive, the latter allows for more inclusive union responses. Contrary to the incentive-based strategy, the attractiveness of the legitimacy-based strategy decreases with higher levels of nonstandard employment, explaining why inclusive union responses typically become more dominant over time.
Keywords"

Digital



Bookmarks Report an error