"This essay takes the intrusion of the term ‘risk management' into the social policy discourse as a ‘moral opportunity' to reconsider the balance between solidarity and individual responsibility. The argument is developed in three stages: first, the psychology of intuitive beliefs and choices provides evidence of the bounded rationality of risky choices. The paper demonstrates how the institutionalization of opportunity structures recommended by the concept of transitional labour markets can overcome various kinds of asymmetries in risk perception. Second, imperfect or strategic information may also cause biased risk perception. Examples, therefore, are provided of how the analysis of labour market transitions throughout the life course can considerably improve the methodology of risk management. Third, the consideration of risk asymmetries and the reduction of information deficits do not yet provide any starting point for constructing acceptable risk sharing institutions. Normative principles of justice therefore have to be reconsidered. It is suggested that Rawls' theory of justice should be enriched by Dworkin's ethical theory and Sen's capability approach."

Support: Digital