By browsing this website, you acknowledge the use of a simple identification cookie. It is not used for anything other than keeping track of your session from page to page. OK
1

Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility

Bookmarks
Article

Son, Su-Young ; Bakri, Ilham ; Muraki, Satoshi ; Tochihara, Yutaka

Applied Ergonomics

2014

45

4

1019-1027

comfort assessment ; equipment testing ; personal protective equipment ; fire fighter

Ergonomics and work environment

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006

English

Bibliogr.

"The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods."

Digital



Bookmarks