Documents dispute settlement 204 results

"This article provides a brief critical examination of a 2002 report jointly issued by the World Health Organization and the World Trade Organization on WTO law and public health. The author argues that the report is in many respects misleading as to the content of WTO law, as interpreted by the Appellate Body of the WTO, its final court. In particular, the WHO/WTO report systematically understates or underestimates the margins of regulatory autonomy that WTO member states have to make regulations that protect public health."

"Conceived by Chris Grey and written to get you thinking, the “Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap” series offers an informal and accessible yet sophisticated and critical overview of what you find in conventional textbooks.

In Employment Relations the authors translate years of experience, with the help of interesting vignettes, real life examples and connections with popular culture, into a critical understanding of the topic that brings the field to life.

An excellent supplementary text for Employment Relations and HRM students or anyone interested in a short, succinct book on the subject of Employment Relations."

"The number of individual disputes arising from day-to-day workers' grievances or complaints continues to grow in many parts of the world. The chapters in this book cover individual labour dispute settlement systems in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Each chapter examines and assesses the institutions and mechanisms for settlement of individual labour disputes, including the procedures and powers available, the interaction of these institutions and mechanisms with other labour market institutions (e.g. collective bargaining and labour inspection) and the broader system for resolution of legal disputes (e.g. courts of general jurisdiction, specialist commissions and tribunals)."

"In light of various reforms in recent years, this article provides a (re)assessment of the broad package of family-friendly employment rights and relevant dispute resolution procedure now available to pregnant workers and working carers. It exposes how the realities of working life for many pregnant workers and carers and the long standing desire to promote gender equality in informal care-work remain at odds with the legal framework. An argument is presented in favour of an approach that, based upon the concept of care ethics, better engages with the impact of the provisions upon crucial interdependent care relationships."

"In Japan, there are three representative systems for resolving individual labor disputes: conciliation by labor bureaus, labor tribunals, and court settlement. When we compare these, we find a tendency for males to be more numerous, regular employees to be more numerous, years of service to be longer, the managerial position to be higher, and the monthly wage to be incrementally higher in the second and third of these than in the first. However, while the difference in monthly wage is 1.4 times and 1.6 times, respectively (i.e. in the second and third systems compared to the first), the difference in resolution amounts is 7.0 times and 14.7 times. This could be because labor bureau conciliation—a voluntary system—gives more incentive to settle on low resolution amounts, while in labor tribunals and courts, a ruling or judgment will be made if no compromise is reached, meaning that the case can be concluded without considering the “risk of the other party getting away."