Documents Pineau, Elodie 2 results

"Objectives
The studies are lacking on the variation of the prevalence of exposure to workplace bullying according to subgroups of national working populations. The objectives were to assess the 12-month prevalence of bullying in the national French working population, to describe the reported reasons for bullying, and to study its variation according to various employment variables.
Methods
The study was based on the data of the 2013 national French working conditions survey. The study sample included 25,769 employees aged 15–65 working in the same job within the last 12 months. The 12-month prevalence of bullying was assessed using a 9-item questionnaire. Employment variables included: occupation, economic activity of the company, public/private sector, company size, permanent/temporary work contract, and full/part-time work. The analyses were performed using statistical methods for weighted survey data.
Results
The 12-month prevalence of bullying was 26.7% and 28.7% for men and women, respectively. The most prevalent forms of bullying were criticisms, exclusion, and deprivation of right of expression. The leading reasons for being bullied were related to occupation, age, and gender. The prevalence of bullying was higher among the younger employees, the employees working in medium/large companies (including the public sector), and among employees working full time. Though significant, the variations according to occupations and economic activities of the company were small.
Conclusion
Workplace bullying appeared as a widespread phenomenon in France. More attention should be given to young employees and the employees working in medium/large companies. Preventive measures should also target the whole working population comprehensively."

This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

"Objectives
The objectives were to assess the prospective associations between work-related factors, including psychosocial and physical work factors and working time/hours factors, and sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence.
Methods
The study relied on prospective data of a national representative sample of 16 129 employees followed up from 2013 to 2016 in France. Work-related factors were assessed in 2013 and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors and 4 physical work factors. Sickness presenteeism was studied using two items in 2016: the presence and duration of sickness presenteeism within the last 12 months. Weighted Hurdle and multinomial logistic regression models were performed to study the prospective associations between work-related factors at baseline and sickness presenteeism (both presence and duration) and sickness absence at follow-up. Models were adjusted for covariates.
Results
Almost all psychosocial and physical work factors were predictive of sickness presenteeism (ORs ranging from 1.30 to 2.07 for men, and from 1.16 to 2.30 for women) but only some of them predicted its duration. Dose–response associations were observed between multiple exposures to these factors and sickness presenteeism. These factors predicted more sickness presenteeism alone or combined with sickness absence than sickness absence alone. Gender differences were observed in these associations, as some associations were found to be stronger among women than among men.
Conclusions
There is a need to study sickness presenteeism and sickness absence combined. Prevention oriented towards the psychosocial and physical work environment may contribute to reduce sickness presenteeism and sickness absence."