Documents Lunau, Thorsten 6 results

"Background
Employees have witnessed rising trend in work stress over the last few decades. However, we know a little about country differences in those trends. Our article fills this gap in the literature by examining heterogeneities in trends in working conditions by country groups defined by their amount of investment into labor market policy (LMP) programs. Additionally, we provide findings on differences in occupational inequalities between country groups.

Methods
We use comparative longitudinal data of the European Working Conditions Surveys including cross-sectional information on employees from 15 countries surveyed in Waves 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015. Estimation results are provided by three-way multilevel models with employees nested within country-years nested within countries. Our work stress measure is the proxy version of job strain based on the demand-control model.

Results
Our regression results indicate that for employees in countries with the least LMP spending job strain increased by 10% from 1995 to 2015 compared to a smaller and insignificant change in middle- and high-LMP countries. In low-LMP countries, inequalities in job strain also widened during the studied period: the gap in job strain between the highest- and lowest-skilled increased by 60% from 1995 to 2015. This contrasts a stable gap in middle- and high-LMP countries.

Conclusions
Our results direct the attention to the vulnerable position of the least skilled and highlight that LMP investments may buffer some of the adverse impacts of globalization and technological changes and effectively improve the labor market situation of the least skilled."

"Background
Workplace-related stress is a major risk factor for mental and physical health problems and related sickness absence and productivity loss. Despite evidence regarding the effectiveness of different workplace-based interventions, the implementation of stress prevention interventions is rare, especially in micro and small-sized enterprises (MSE) with fewer than 50 employees. The joint research project “PragmatiKK”+ aims to identify and address the specific barriers to the implementation of stress prevention interventions in MSE. This study protocol describes a mixed method study design to evaluate the effectiveness of adapted stress prevention interventions and the implementation process via an integrated web-based platform (“System P”) specifically targeted at MSE.

Methods
First, we develop a web-based intervention, which accounts for the specific working conditions in MSE and addresses stress prevention at a structural and behavioral level. Second, we use common methods of implementation research to perform an effect and process evaluation. We analyze the effectiveness of the web-based stress prevention interventions by comparing depressive symptoms at baseline and follow-up (after 6 months and 12 months). Indicators for a successful implementation process include acceptability, adoption, feasibility, reach, dose, and fidelity, which we will measure with quantitative web-based questionnaires and qualitative interviews. We will also analyze the accumulated usage data from the web-based platform.

Discussion
Collecting data on the implementation process and the effectiveness of a web-based intervention will help to identify and overcome common barriers to stress prevention in MSE. This can improve the mental health of employees in MSE, which constitute more than 90% of all enterprises in Germany."

"Hintergrund
Die traditionelle Arbeitsstressforschung identifizierte eine große Zahl von Stressoren. Die Technik als Stressquelle stand dagegen lange nicht im Fokus des Interesses.

Fragestellung
Dieser Artikel beschreibt das Konzept des Technostresses und diskutiert mögliche Risiken und Chancen digitaler Technologien bei der Arbeit und deren Auswirkungen auf die psychische Gesundheit.

Material und Methode
Übersicht zur Konzeptualisierung von Technostress, potenzieller Wirkmechanismen und Zusammenfassung empirischer Ergebnisse zum Einfluss auf die psychische Gesundheit.

Ergebnisse
Bisher wurden mehrere Domänen von Technostress definiert. Obgleich die Evidenzbasis schmal ist und Studien mit methodischen Einschränkungen behaftet sind, so legen erste Ergebnisse zumindest nahe, dass sich bestimmte Arten von technischem Stress bei der Arbeit ungünstig auf die psychische Gesundheit auswirken können. Zugleich können digitale Technologien auch positive Auswirkungen auf das psychische Wohlbefinden von Arbeitnehmern haben, wenn sie z. B. eine bessere Arbeitsorganisation ermöglichen.

Schlussfolgerung
Die Digitalisierung der Arbeit scheint sowohl Chancen als auch Risiken für die psychische Gesundheit der Beschäftigten zu haben. Implikationen für weitere Forschung in diesem sich entwickelnden Feld werden herausgearbeitet."

"Hintergrund und Ziel
Ob sozioökonomische Faktoren die Ausbreitung von SARS-CoV‑2 beeinflussen, ist nicht ausreichend beantwortet, da frühere Studien in der Regel kumulative Inzidenzen betrachtet und die zeitliche Entwicklung der Ausbreitung außer Acht gelassen haben. Dieser Beitrag konzentriert sich daher auf die Entwicklung von regionalen Neuinfektionen in Zusammenhang mit sozioökonomischen Faktoren. Ausgehend vom internationalen Forschungsstand präsentieren wir eigene Analysen von Meldedaten aus Deutschland.

Methoden
Diese Studie untersucht regionale Daten gemeldeter COVID-19-Fälle für die 401 Landkreise und kreisfreien Städte (Kreisebene) in Deutschland und vergleicht den zeitlichen Verlauf entlang sozioökonomischer Merkmale der Kreise. Betrachtet werden altersstandardisierte wöchentliche Inzidenzen für den Zeitraum 03.02.2020–28.03.2021. Sozial- und Wirtschaftsindikatoren auf Kreisebene stammen aus der INKAR(Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung)-Datenbank (z. B. Einkommen, Beschäftigtenquote, Wohnfläche).

Ergebnisse
Während in der ersten und zu Beginn der zweiten Welle der Pandemie Kreise mit höherem mittleren Haushaltseinkommen höhere Inzidenzen hatten, stiegen sie in Kreisen mit niedrigem Einkommen ab Dezember 2020 deutlich an. Kreise mit einem hohen Anteil an Beschäftigten allgemein und speziell solchen im Produktionssektor hatten gerade in der zweiten und dritten Welle hohe Inzidenzen. Kreise mit einer geringen Wohnfläche je Einwohner hatten ab November 2020 ausgeprägt höhere Inzidenzen.

Schlussfolgerung
Der regionale Verlauf der Pandemie unterscheidet sich nach Sozial- und Wirtschaftsindikatoren. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung dieser Unterschiede könnte Hinweise auf zielgruppenspezifische Schutz- und Teststrategien geben und helfen, soziale Faktoren zu identifizieren, die Infektionen begünstigen."

"Objective
The rapid transformation of labor markets has been accompanied by the belief of rising stress at work. However, empirical evidence on such trends based on reliable survey data is scarce. This study analyzes long-term trends in well-established measures of work stressors across Europe, as well as potential occupational differences.

Methods
We use repeated cross-sectional data of 15 European countries from waves 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 of the European Working Conditions Surveys. We apply three-way multilevel regressions (with employees nested in country-years, which are in turn nested in countries) to analyze trends in work stressors measured according to the demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models. Trends by occupational groups are also assessed.

Results
Our findings suggest that work stress generally increased from 1995 to 2015, and that the increase was mostly driven by psychological demands. People working in lower-skilled occupations had generally higher levels of job strain and effort-reward imbalance, as well as they tend to have a steeper increase in job strain than people working in higher-skilled occupations. Most of the change occurred from 1995 to 2005.

Conclusion
Our results indicate that work stress has been on rise since 1995, specifically for people working in disadvantageous occupations. This directs the attention to the vulnerable position of the least skilled and also to the use of preventive measures to counteract some of the disadvantages experienced by this occupational group."

"Background
As the largest study of its kind to date, this article aims to describe the scope, trends over time, socio-demographic risk groups and the association with different progressive regulations relating to workplace second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure in 29 European countries during a period of high regulatory action.

Methods
Three waves of the European Working Conditions Surveys (2005, 2010 and 2015) were evaluated, including a total of 95 718 workers. The samples are representative for all employed residents of the 29 countries included. All interviews were conducted face-to-face at respondents' homes (computer-assisted personal interviews). SHS exposure among the overall working population of 29 countries—including smokers—was examined. Workplace regimes were grouped corresponding to the sub-scale ‘workplace' as used in the Tobacco Control Scale.

Results
Between 2005 and 2015, SHS exposure in the European countries declined from around 19.0% (95% CI 16.1–22.0) to 9.9% (8.3–11.5). High SHS-exposure was reported by workers with the lowest level of education [11.5% (9.7–13.2)], among high-skilled manual labourers [14.3% (12.1–16.4)] and among those without a standard employment contract [11.2% (9.3–13.1)]. The highest exposure was reported by workers in the food service industry [19.7% (16.8–22.6)]. Countries with less workplace-related smoking prevention regulations were found to have the highest overall levels of exposure.

Conclusion
This multinational series of cross-sectional surveys on the trends in passive smoking in the workplace have shown that countries with more comprehensive workplace smoking bans overall report lower levels of SHS exposure among their work force as compared with slow progressing countries."