Documents Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens 3 results

"We analyze unemployment dynamics for Germany on a regional basis by means of an approximate factor model. We first estimate the number of factors corresponding to the number of cycles. At least for the pre-'Hartz' reform data we find strong evidence for more than just one dynamic labor market cycle present in German regions. Thus, labor market dynamics are driven by more than a single nationwide business cycle. Next, we look for regional partitions reflecting the different cycles best. Our results indicate pronounced differences between East and West Germany for 1997 to 2004 and ongoing but reduced differences between 2005 and 2010. A convergence process is found to have taken place up until late 2001. There is evidence for the differences observed before 2004 to be driven by active labor market policy, which thus had a volatility-increasing effect on the labor market."

"This paper lays out the various reasons for the exceptional performance of the German labour market during and after the Great Recession of 2008/9. The reference point of our analysis is provided by an empirical model of both total hours worked and employment. We conduct dynamic simulations of the crisis period to assess how surprising the reaction of the labour market really was. We argue that the most important precondition for the minor reaction of employment during this crisis was the pronounced wage moderation observed in the years before, which constitutes a distinct difference to all other recessions in Germany. Beyond that, the flexibility of adjusting working time, which has increased considerably during the past ten years, facilitated a tendency to labour hoarding. In contrast, short-time work plays a minor role in explaining the difference from previous recessions, since this instrument has always been available to firms in Germany and its use has not been extraordinary compared with earlier recessions. "

"The authors note that, although public budgets showed significant surpluses before the Corona crisis, both revenues and expenditures had risen noticeably relative to economic output. They currently see it as a priority goal of fiscal policy to overcome the acute crisis, whereby the equity position of companies and the financial resources of local authorities should be considered by the federal government in view of the recovery. In doing so, the federal government is not obliged to take over the old debts. However, in accordance with the principle of connectivity, the federal government should pay for all services that it decides to provide without exception. In the medium term, if growth declines, the consolidation policy that will then be necessary should be based primarily on spending discipline and subsidy reduction rather than on an increase in the tax burden. Rather, in view of the intense international tax competition, the authors advocate using any room for maneuver that may exist to ease the burden on companies. For the financing of supraregional infrastructures, they recommend greater involvement of users. As a result of the Corona crisis, they see the reintroduction of the catch-up factor in pension insurance as necessary, which provides for lower pension adjustments in the aftermath of the crisis if a pension reduction that is actually due to the development of gross wages and salaries does not materialize. Moreover, federal grants should be clearly linked to non-insurance benefits and limited to these."